ad:tech New York: the digital strategies of Obama

Drew Ianni, ad:tech advisory board chairman/programming, started off the Wednesday sessions with a technology-friendly introduction to Shelly Lazarus: "Ogilvy was the first major agency to believe in - and take an interest in - digital and integrating new kinds of advertising into programs for their clients."

But the chairman/ceo of Ogilvy & Mather Worldwide had something else in mind: "As I stand before you, my daughter is in labor," Lazarus revealed. But that wasn't her punchline. She continued, "Remember how people used to save the front page of their daily newspaper to celebrate a child's birth? Well, I'm so happy. The front page of today's Times is a great page." The single word OBAMA - all caps, centered and splashed across the top of page 1 - will be the keeper for the Lazarus family. And, as luck would have it, the story beneath the banner was the first of a series of digital narratives that would ground the Ogilvy head's ad:tech presentation.
Digital comes of political age: the Obama campaign
"Team Obama brought their brand to life in ways that no candidate has ever done before," Lazarus declared. "They brought them directly to the people. He won and the world has changed forever."
"If you are uncomfortable with change and ambiguity," she cautioned the ad:tech gathering, "this is not your time. If you need to test something five times before you try a sixth, this is not your time. But, if you love to make it up as you go along, if you welcome the happy collision of advertising and technology, if you're really creative, if you want to try new tools, if you're looking to listen in on new conversations and respond instantly, your time has come.
"When I started in this business, direct-mail people used to say, 'Just try to imagine what is would be like if you could actually talk to a consumer or a prospect to find out if they really were interested. We don't have to imagine any more."
As brand builders and marketers, she continued, "We can conclude that the Obama team knew how to use the tools that are now available to us all." In fact, she added, it was fair to conclude that the candidate's "digital-ness" had helped drive his victorious campaign.
Indeed, the ultimate success of the new-media political effort "affords marketers with a way to use new opportunities for interactivity with their target audiences. Obama was in constant dialogue with his base without the interference of the established press. He took his messages directly to his missionaries.
"And here's a question," she continued. "He ran his campaign this way. Will he govern in the same way? Last night, around 11 p.m., I received a real-time email from Obama. 'I'm about to head to Grant Park to talk to everyone gathered there,' he wrote, 'but I wanted to write to you first. We just made history. We have a lot of work to do to get our country back on track, and I'll be in touch soon about what comes next.'"
"It was all part of the best CRM campaign that's ever been run," Lazarus said. "The Obama campaign had a state-of-the-art web site. Pages on social-media sites. Twitter to track the candidate from one moment to the next. They had their own 'Race to the White House' game, Xbox games, iPhone applications, free ringtones. More than 12 million downloads of a 'Yes We Can' You Tube video brought emotion and momentum to the campaign. Four million donors and volunteers got daily email updates. They used every trick in the marketers' book, right down to their own 'Front Row to History' that offered winners a trip to Chicago to watch the returns. It was just like Publisher's Clearing House.
"Their motto seemed to be, 'If you think it, you can do it.' They really were masters of CRM."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjXyqcx-mYY

Nielsen: Social Nets Overtake E-mail

As online paradigm shifts, advertisers must find a way to add value, rather than follow the 'push' model
March 9, 2009
-By Brian Morrissey

NEW YORK Social networking has overtaken e-mail as the most popular Internet activity, according to a new study released by Nielsen. Active reach in what Nielsen defines as "member communities" now exceeds e-mail participation by 67 percent to 65 percent. What's more, the reach of social networking and blogging venues is growing at twice the rate of other large drivers of Internet use such as portals, e-mail and search. Nielsen, which is the parent company of Adweek, concluded that the shift to social activity online would have profound effects on marketers and publishers. For publishers, social networks are eating into time spent with other online activities, according to Nielsen.
For advertisers, the phenomenon at this stage represents mostly unfulfilled promise for a deeper connection with consumers who are more difficult to reach in social environments. The rise of social media coincides with the decline of portals. Social networking appears to be snatching away users' online time formerly spent with e-mail, traditionally a large draw to portals. Such fragmentation is decreasing portals' importance to advertisers. In a separate report, top digital shop Razorfish said its spending at portals declined from 24 percent in 2006 to 16 percent in 2008. Nielsen found that two-thirds of the world's Internet users visited a social networking site in 2008. All told, social media now accounts for almost 10 percent of Internet time. Facebook is leading the pack worldwide, with monthly visits by three out of 10 Internet users in nine global markets, per Nielsen. The growth in social media is not confined to the U.S. Nielsen charted comparable or higher growth for Australia, Spain, Italy and the United Kingdom. Yet for now, user growth at social sites is outpacing advertising increases, per Nielsen. This will likely change, Nielsen said, as models shift to value engagement over exposure. "As the online industry matures and the value of online real estate is increasingly measured by time spent, rather than pages viewed, a significant shift in advertising revenue from 'traditional' online media towards social media could be realized -- if the successful ad model can be found," the report stated. The search for a workable ad model is even more urgent now that social media has broken out of the youth demographic, Nielsen found. For example, Facebook's greatest growth has come from 35-49-year-olds, and it has added twice as many 50-64-year-olds as those under 18. Yet advertising and social media to date have mixed like oil and water. Part of that is a function of social media's communications role -- advertising has typically performed poorly in chat and e-mail. The larger challenge for advertising is to move from an interruptive role to joining conversations. That means advertisers need to find ways to add value to users' experiences, Nielsen found. "Whatever the successful ad model turns out to be, the messaging will have to be authentic and humble, and built on the principle of two-way conversation -- not a push model -- that adds value to the consumer," the report said.

Use Email Campaigns To Generate More Email Campaigns–And Conversions

March12th, 2009 by eydie

Some marketers have only recently realized the importance of email. Others think it’s old hat. But true forward-thinkers are already taking their campaigns to the next level.
A business blogger at the Sydney Morning Herald points out a particular email discussion that happened at the Adtech conference held in Sydney this week, regarding “trigger-based” messages. Trigger-based email is sent according to a consumer’s particular behavior or preferences. For example, in an emailed company newsletter, there might be a link about a particular product. When the reader clicks on that link, this then triggers another email sent to the customer, offering a special sales offer regarding that product. Such links don’t have to be about a company’s product; a consumer’s birthday or purchasing preferences are other types of triggers.
Trigger-based messages, then, ensure that a brand remains engaged with and relevant to consumers by giving them important updates. The Herald blog points to HSBC Bank in Australia, which used trigger-based email marketing “to keep consumers engaged and informed” during their loan application process. This was done because many loan applicants shop around with several banks, and HSBC did not want them to go elsewhere for their loans. The upshot? HSBC Bank saw an approximately 65 percent improvement in acceptance of home loans.
Think of trigger-based email as the master’s degree after getting a bachelor degree in email marketing: The rules of email marketing best practices must foremost be understood and used. The customer must be the one to subscribe to get email messages, and the company must explain what to expect in these messages–as well as how often to expect them. As always, relevance is the key–if you start sending messages of the type that were not expected, the consumer might ignore your email and/or cancel the subscription.
Of course, trigger-based messaging can only work if the marketer really knows the customer. So it’s important to use an email-sending platform that will gather certain information, both demographic and “psychographic,” into a user-friendly database. Once such a database is compiled, the marketer can start creating triggers based on consumers’ preferences and personal profiles. (And maybe this database creation can be accelerated by using a product-click triggered email campaign first.)
Clearly, marketers who aren’t yet in email had better get cracking. Their competitors have already mastered the basics!

M & M World

Brand strategies for an economic downturn

September 2008, Issue 497

Julie Bazinet, Steve Saxty and Belle Frank

In financial markets as in marketing, perception is often reality. Today, while all economists may not agree that we are officially in a recession, consumers are increasingly pessimistic about the state of the economy and are behaving as though we are in one. As the cost of oil and food continues to climb, and property values continue to plunge, consumers are looking for ways to save and also maximise value when they do spend. For marketers, dropping prices is always an option, but this often does nothing more than undermine margins and brand equity. So, how do we go about 'recession proofing' our brands for the realities of today?
If successful brands are those that generate consideration and loyalty, in good times and bad, all brands would be wise to invest in these qualities during recessions, when consumers are much more selective about what they purchase. The dotcom bust, 9/11, corporate scandals and the war in Iraq all contributed to the recession of 2001–2002 and shook consumer confidence in government, business and other institutions, including brands.
Based on information from Young & Rubicam's model, BrandAsset® Valuator (BAV), we are able to understand what happened to brands during this period in order to help our clients protect themselves from today's economically depressed environment. Our data suggest previous periods of downturn were marked by a strong focus on value, accompanied by a decline in brand trust, credibility and loyalty. Brands that were able to stay on top of their game mastered delivery of those qualities.
By the beginning of 2008, easy credit had accelerated the real estate market, and encouraged consumers and lenders to speculate on ever-increasing levels of home equity. For many, the gamble did not pay off. The resulting credit crunch and consumer interest in value applies pressure on brands. In order to compete in today's market, BAV indicates that a brand must reframe value through leadership, vision and performance if it is to stand out amid limitless competitive brand options. It must also maintain its trust and credibility while doing so. The bar has been raised!
Y&R's BAV (see Appendix) allows us to assess the role of brands as part of our culture; we can get a picture of the values of a society by considering what drives its most successful brands at various points in time (1).
DECLINE IN CONSIDERATION AND LOYALTY
In the late 1990s, consumer confidence was on an upswing, fuelled by the dotcom frenzy. Interestingly, we saw in BAV that emotional loyalty, defined as a preference for a certain brand over all others, moved upwards in line with consumer confidence indices. The spike in emotional loyalty during the late 1990s/early 2000s can be attributed to the aspirational quality of many higher-end branded products that were suddenly within reach of a wider range of consumers. But, in 2002, exacerbated by the terrorist attacks of the previous year, emotional loyalty crashed, along with the financial markets. From 2000 to 2002, emotional loyalty and preference as measured in BAV declined by 27% and 20% respectively, whereas the typical change year-on-year is approximately 5% (see Figure 1).

Figure 1: Brand loyalty

During this time, brand usage surpassed brand preference (see Figure 2), an indication in our data that buyers were becoming less emotionally attached to brands. We found that many consumers went from being loyal to a single brand to being open to a variety of brands. This behaviour can be explained by the vast increase in the number of available brands and the amount of information about them available on the internet, coupled with the economic reality that more consumers were now being forced to rationalise their purchasing decisions.

Figure 2: Brand usage

DECLINE IN CONFIDENCE AND TRUST
From 2001 to 2005, brand imagery characteristics such as 'trustworthy', 'reliable', 'high quality' and 'good value', as attributed to brands by consumers responding to the BAV survey, declined continuously, to eventually stabilise at a mere 65%, on average, of their pre-recession levels (see Figure 3). It is not that these attributes declined because they became less important. Quite the contrary, it is more likely that, in consumers' minds, brands simply failed to deliver them. Technology brands in particular took a big hit on these attributes during the last recession, which is not surprising given the dotcom bust. This suggests that today's marketers have to focus on building credibility and trust in order to endure the current economic climate.

Figure 3: Brand imagery

CHANGES IN DRIVERS OF CONSIDERATION AND LOYALTY
According to BAV, 'good value' was a key driver of brand consideration and loyalty from 1999 to 2002, along with 'high quality' and 'socially responsible'. Given the realities of the time, it is not surprising that value, quality and responsibility became so important for consumers. However, what is even more interesting is how these drivers changed as the economy recovered. From 2005 to 2007, drivers of consideration like leadership and performance were more than twice as important as they were during the recessionary period, indicating that consumers had begun rewarding brands that helped them navigate the overwhelming amount of choice and information available today (see Figure 4).

Figure 4: Leadership and performance

SPECIFIC CHALLENGES FOR TODAY
Data from the last recessionary period highlight the importance of value as a basic requirement for consumer brand sustenance. However, as the Detroit carmakers can testify, addressing this consumer need simply by dropping prices is no guarantee of long-term prosperity.
Therefore, a wider reframing of value must become at least one part of the equation. Low price alone has not proven to be enough to build a strong brand. We know that now more than ever, it is important for brands to demonstrate leadership, vision and high performance if they are to meet consumer expectations. To attain optimal loyalty and consideration, brands must guide and inspire consumers in their quest to offer more value. The following are five approaches that different brands have employed that have helped them achieve these goals.
1. Highlight the Value Proposition that Enables your Brand to Stand Out
Marketers can change the way consumers think about their brand by reframing their value proposition. During the last recession, luxury brands like BMW and Mercedes achieved growth, at a time when one might assume they would face declining sales. By highlighting their total cost of ownership and offering fixed maintenance costs, they managed to achieve volume growth, as buyers became attuned to value rather than sticker price.
More recently, the V8 brand was able to reframe its value by reminding buyers that a serving of V8 is nutritionally equivalent to three servings of vegetables; it also costs less, and has the additional benefit of zero spoilage. For buyers who are feeling the pressure to save on rising grocery bills, such a message has resonance.
2. Remove Cost while Adding Additional Benefit Appeals
Often, there are opportunities for a brand to remove or reconfigure aspects of its product, but to do it in a way that does not reduce value – or that even increases it. For example, Poland Spring water recently changed its packaging, saving on both cost and materials, while simultaneously creating a leadership proposition that is environmentally appealing.
For retailers like Best Buy which sell large products that are difficult to transport home, such as large-screen televisions and washing machines, drop-shipping orders (shipping them directly from the manufacturer) can save money and hassle for both store and customer. The retailer's shipping and warehousing costs are reduced, and the buyers get quicker and cheaper delivery with less risk of damage to the product.
3. Empower Customers with Trade off Options
When faced with limited financial resources, consumers inevitably make trade-offs when they are looking to purchase products or services. Therefore, another strategy for increasing value is to provide consumers with trade-off options that they otherwise would not have.
Dell was a pioneer in employing this approach. Historically, PCs were sold as standard packages through retailers. During the recession of the early 1990s, the company was able to focus on its direct-to-consumer sales model, thereby eliminating the cost and competition of selling through the retail channel. The direct model not only allowed Dell to pass some of these savings to its customers, but it now became possible to customise each computer in a cost-effective way. Customers benefited not only from a lower price point, but also from a product that perfectly matched their requirements, providing Dell with much competitive leverage and a huge boost in sales volume.
4. Build Loyalty by Connecting with Customers' Core Beliefs and Personal Values, as well as their Need for Value
One of the most fundamental ways to connect to consumers is for a brand to differentiate itself from competitors and build loyalty by providing a benefit that would be emotionally compelling on its own and then boost it further by offering financial value.
Recessions can be brutally challenging for retailers. However, Target Corporation has experienced phenomenal growth since the recession of the early 2000s by promising and delivering 'cheap chic' to its customers. The affluence of the late 1990s had whetted consumers' appetites for increasingly upscale brands, but the economic reality of the job market meant that, for many consumers, such products were out of reach.
Still, consumers yearned for them, and Target was savvy enough to provide them at a price point almost anyone could afford – a smart marketing approach that made consumers feel smart. The resulting effect on Target's brand has been significant. Target's brand equity had always trailed Wal-Mart's in BAV, but this strategy has helped the brand become stronger each year. Finally, in 2007, Target overtook Wal-Mart to become the strongest retail brand in America, while Wal-Mart, whose positioning had focused almost exclusively on price, remains a strong but stagnant brand.
5. Consider what your Brand can do for Someone Else
There are of course times when a more thorough retargeting is needed to help brands weather the challenges of difficult economic times. For some brands, a customer base that is too small or one that becomes unable to afford the product might force a rethink about how to engage a wider audience.
In 2000, General Motors faced a declining domestic middle-class market for its Buick range, as US buyers sought either lower-priced vehicles from rivals Honda and Toyota or more upscale brands. The surprising decision to export a few thousand units to China to recoup fixed costs of production met with considerable Chinese enthusiasm, and sales took off because the brand was regarded as affordable, American and classy. As sales remained flat in the domestic market, GM began investing in products tailored to Chinese tastes, and sales continued to increase. In 2006, China became Buick's largest market, surpassing sales in the United States.
PROTECT YOUR BRAND ASSETS
The current economic downturn is driven by different factors from those of the last recession, and consumers have raised the bar in terms of what they expect from brands. Our data show that consumers increasingly want their brands to deliver leadership, vision and performances as well as value.
Luckily, this time around, advances in online communication, distribution and eco-friendly packaging, to name but a few, suggest that brands have infinitely more options to reframe their value propositions and connect with their customers than ever before.
The 'do nothing but cut prices' approach, as Taco Bell employed during the last recession, only weakens a brand, according to BAV data. And beware of this tactic, for its impact can be, and often sadly is, a long-lasting one.
Brands that have the agility to deliver optimal value to their customers, even if it requires substantial change in how they operate or communicate, may not only survive the recession better but even thrive in it.
APPENDIX 1: BRANDASSET® VALUATOR
BAV is a huge database on brands. Since 1993, Y&R has surveyed over 500,000 consumers across 44 markets about more than 35,000 brands. BAV gauges consumer perceptions on brand health and imagery, relating them to brand usage, consideration and loyalty. In each market, BAV measures brands relative to all other brands.
1. B Frank and M Sussman: Brand health measures your mother would love. Admap 492, March 2008.
Julie Bazinet is associate director, analytic brand planning, at Y&R.julie.bazinet@yr.com
Steve Saxty is SVP, group planning director, at Y&R.steve.saxty@yr.com
Belle Frank is EVP, director of strategy and research, at Y&R.belle.frank@yr.com

Brand management: then and now

Quarter 1, January 2009

Tim Ambler

London Business School




Marketing has become far more professional in the 50 years since the Marketing Society was founded. This article takes a look at that development in order to speculate about where marketing will be in decades to come. These thoughts have been influenced immensely by discussions with some of the brightest young marketers of today.1
As the word 'marketing' means different things to different people, we will focus on brand management. How was it in the 1960s, how has it changed and how is brand management today? What can we expect, or perhaps hope for, in the future?
'Brand' is now a word in common currency. In this sense, marketing is a two-stage process: creating demand (brand equity) and then converting that demand into positive cash flow (selling). In both stages, marketers manage their brands to obtain satisfactory short-term profitability while at the same time building their brands for the long term. The conflict between these two objectives, with the accent usually on the first, provides much of the difficulty.
THEN
Procter & Gamble is usually credited with inventing brand managers, starting with Camay soap in the 1930s. By the late 1950s the advertising for 'fabulous pink Camay' had moved beyond cliché to being a joke. Its appearance in a cinema provoked roars of laughter and cartons being thrown at the screen. Media selection was not well connected with the target audience. Those were the days!
Cinema commercials can still provoke that reaction but not when the campaigns are products of professional brand management. The 1960s had very few of those. Marketing plans, where they existed at all, were written by the ad agencies – often UK branches of US agencies who were more advanced in such matters.
Typical of most consumer marketing companies in those days was my company, International Distillers and Vintners which created its first UK marketing department in the mid-1960s. An international marketing team for J&B Rare scotch whisky already existed: one man and his secretary. Croft Original sherry was inspired by the ad agency Mather & Crowther, using the already very successful (in the US) J&B Rare as a model. J&B was a scotch for people who thought whisky was smart but didn't much like the taste. It was based on J&B's previous international spirits success: Very Special Old Pale cognac. Croft Original was also pale in colour because sherry (then the main wine and spirit category) consumers thought fino, i.e. pale sherry, was smart but found it too dry in taste. So Croft looks like a fino but is sweet to the palate. Repeating the J&B formula may not have been deliberate but it worked. The new marketing team launched Croft by sending a case to every trade customer who ordered enough Smirnoff. Not a great launch plan but it secured distribution.
However, rather more professional brand management was becoming widespread in fmcg companies selling largely through supermarkets, which were rapidly gaining strength at the expense of traditional outlets, thanks to the abolition of retail price maintenance.
Kotler's Marketing Management was already the dominant textbook and the 4 Ps provided the structure for marketing plans. Nielsen was the main supplier of market research and was primarily used to ginger up the sales force. Every two months Nielsen would present distribution figures including facings and out of stocks, down to quite detailed sales areas. High- and low-performing sales managers were complimented and castigated respectively, whether they deserved it or not. Research was used intermittently for consumer usage and attitudes, primarily for advertising purposes. TV campaigns were researched in cinemas by testing brand preference before and after seeing a batch of commercials that included the brands being researched. Knobs on the arms of our seats were turned this way or that to indicate pleasure or interest in whatever was on the screen at the time.
It all seems fairly simplistic as one looks back but it did not seem so at the time. Only one TV channel carried advertising. Two main suppliers dominated posters and a few chains took care of cinema. Diversity lay in the press. The full service ad agencies provided figures on cost per thousand, reach and frequency. PR completed the marcoms portfolio. Specialist marketing consultants were rare as few had enough experience to sell.
Brand managers then had arguably more control over the 4 Ps, certainly marketing communications, promotions, price and, thanks to Nielsen, distribution. On the other hand, brand managers barely existed beyond fmcg and drinks companies.
Before moving on, we should note the birth of account planning in the 1960s, created in slightly different ways by Stanley Pollitt at BMP and Stephen King at JWT. This rigorous approach to using consumer market research for ad campaign development, good as it was and is, had very little attention in its early days.
FOUR BIG CHANGES SINCE THEN
The first big change followed the recognition that marketing was essentially a competitive game. Market share replaced sales as the key measure of success. The Market Science Institute in the US, founded back in 1961, claimed that market dominance was the driver of profits. Grow market share, it was thought, and profits would then increase too. We now know that is not the case; growing market share can decrease profits if it depends on excessive price cutting or promotions. We now know that increasing the perceived quality of the brand, or brand equity, drives both share and profitability. In other words, share and profits may correlate but only because both are driven by the same thing.
The second big change was the computer. The first stage was the shift, with the IBM 360 in the 1960s, from batch processing of operational data for distribution and accounting purposes to the production of marketing information. This arrived as piles of printouts. Brand managers did not care very much for all this paper but they stacked it high to impress senior managers. It was used symbolically to show that brand people had tabs on the market even when the pile was as virginal as when it left the print room.
By the mid-1980s, brand management had spread across the business community, apart from business to business and financial services. Computer terminals provided information in a more friendly fashion. But terminals meant that marketers were less likely to leave their offices.
By the mid-1990s, terminals had been replaced by PCs, then laptops, then notebooks and then the BlackBerry. At the same time, more research agencies and in-house IT departments were each offering more information on a wider variety of topics. Available information expanded exponentially.
More recently, the digital age has given us the web, emails, Excel spreadsheets for forecasting and the dreaded PowerPoint, all on memory sticks the size of condom packets. Data protection has become more important than conception. At least brand managers no longer have to carry around piles of paper, guard books (the repositories for ad campaigns) and boxes of slides.
The third big change has been complexity. Whereas the brand manager of the 1960s had to deal with about six or eight suppliers (not that ad agencies wish to be seen as suppliers), today's brand manager has to manage both creative and media agencies, other marcoms and promotions specialists, as well as a myriad of consultants and research companies. A large company may have 30 marketing services' suppliers and, of course, media have proliferated. Trade marketing and customer relationships have developed their own teams and management, often as part of sales or operations rather than marketing in the departmental sense.
No doubt there have been other big changes too, but I will mention just one more, namely accountability. Attention has shifted from sales to the bottom line. Marketers are now expected to justify their expenditures in terms of the payback. That has brought a demand for estimating customer lifetime values and customer equity. Some firms now believe they can manage customers to maximise profit. This is a complete negation of marketing: we should empathise with customers to maximise their satisfaction and only profit as a consequence of that. You could say Tesco is managed by its customers but the reality is that it is a partnership for mutual benefit.
BRAND MANAGEMENT TODAY
Marketing today is certainly more diverse – multi-sectoral, with many more opportunities, and possibly more competitive. I am often told that 'price is more important now' but that is unlikely to be true. Price always was important. Now that people have more choices, higher wealth in real terms and less time for price comparison, price is probably less important, despite price comparison websites. Talking with top young marketers today, none of them mentioned price as an issue until prompted. Penny pinching by retailers remains an issue.
The strengths of brand management today, at least in the opinion of the brand managers themselves, very much revolve around being able not just to cope with the complexity of modern marketing, but to turn that to their advantage. They are very conscious of how they can add value. As one of the respondents, Suzi Williams, observed, 'brands are no longer inert things to be controlled. They are like adolescents and we can only facilitate their development' and 'emotion leads to action where logic leads only to conclusions'.
To handle so much complexity, the numbers employed in the marketing departments of large companies have multiplied, thereby contradicting the regular headlines about cutbacks. Outsourcing is both a solution and a problem. It may be genuinely cheaper to put the work out and the agency may have better and more relevant expertise, but it is yet another agency to manage, who have different goals and may not have to implement their recommendations.
Another consequence is the universal view that brand managers do not get out enough to meet customers and share the consumer experience. No quantity of market research reports will substitute for feeling the market as it is. Some companies ensured brand managers had field force experience first and spent at least one day a week in the field. Some still do. In practice, 15% field time is quite good but the consensus was that it should, and will, grow in the future. That depends, though, on cracking the 'meetings culture' of some large firms.
There is no doubt that marketers today see themselves as tougher and more commercial. The accountability trend mentioned above is part of that, but so is marketing's coordinating role. One of the respondents for this article, Ben Crawley, said 'brand management is a great grounding in so many business issues and for networking too'. That is encouraging. Marketing has long been seen as the colouring-in department where artistic young people do their creative thing before moving to bigger marketing budgets in other companies. Judging by my respondents, that is less true. Yes, marketing is a plum job so a better marketing job will beat another role and yet more marketers now see themselves as budding general managers. They also recognise more need to increase the time and money devoted to marketing internally.
On the negative side, modern brand management has seen over-extension that has 'taken brands too far', as Liesa Johnston put it. The shortest distance between two profit forecasts is a line extension. It is a quick fix that demands no brand investment and brings instant distribution. But it can, as Baileys Irish Cream has shown, damage parent brand equity and reduce profits after the initial surge.
If true, the call for integration is encouraging because marketers should engage with their colleagues and be seen as key to achieving the firm's goals, not just marketing goals. Marketing is not just a luxury for when finances permit. MBAs today, without prior marketing experience, find it almost impossible to get marketing jobs, but that will change if brand management is going to become as commercial as my respondents claim. Marketers need general business skills and generalists need marketing skills.
There are so many facets of modern brand management that a full account would be too long and this selection is inevitably subjective. But we need to conclude with what seems to be the dominant paradigm today. As noted above, accountability is good to the extent that it keeps marketing feet on the commercial floor but bad if it:

• undermines the immeasurable long term in favour of the quantifiable short-term. In past years, short-term goals were set low enough to expect some spare cash flow once they were achieved; that could then be hidden in the following year's expenditure to protect the longer term, e.g. the ad budget; getting that past your accountants and auditors is just as feasible today; it is naïve to report a higher bottom line than it needs to be
  


• locks marketing into the perception that it is a cost to be cut like any other
  


• involves too much time forecasting, planning, and reporting – leave all that to the accountants
  


• is built on false performance measurement models like ROI or purely short-term financial figures with no recognition of the marketing asset, namely brand equity; regrettably, that is the general picture today
  


• requires simply too many metrics or KPIs – just as brand managers have to cope with complexity by increasing focus, so marketers need to agree with senior colleagues what are the metrics that matter and not be distracted by those that do not; the tool that addresses that is the 'dashboard'; none of my respondents mentioned such a thing but I am confident it is on its way.

BRAND MANAGEMENT IN THE DECADES TO COME
Clearly the web will play a growing part but it is fanciful to suggest that it will enable brand managers to have meaningful one-to-one consumer dialogue. Consumers will communicate more with each other. Smart brand managers will monitor those exchanges and learn from them but they will rarely intervene. As the poet said 'the great advantage of keeping your mouth shut is that you cannot put your foot in it'.
On the other hand, brand managers will find ways for consumers to reach them when they really have to. Today's blank wall of call centres, ex-directory HQs and FAQs is immensely frustrating for consumers with genuine issues to resolve. Brand managers cannot be swamped by such matters but systems must be found for direct communication when necessary. Expert systems should be able to deal with most contacts but highlight those that need the brand manager's personal attention.
This may be optimistic but I believe a common business language shared by marketers and non-marketers alike will emerge. The idea that figures with pound signs in front of them matter and the rest do not, is so silly that it cannot prevail for long. At the same time, brand managers should respect continuity and stop chasing the fashionable metric or business process of the month.
Peppers and Rogers' Return on Customer and Reichheld's Net Promoter Score are two recent examples. To put it politely, both are flawed. Yet marketers leap to adopt them. Maybe the Marketing Society or the Marketing Science Institute in the US will set up panels of experts to review these things, rather as NICE does for drugs, before brand managers begin to use them. No CEO would then accept unapproved metrics.
This shared language will be part of non-marketer executives becoming far more savvy about what marketing can and should do for their businesses. They will recognise that marketing is the sourcing and harvesting of cash flow. Accountants will be measuring brand equity as part of their own routines using research shared with brand managers. HR people will be agreeing internal marketing plans with their marketing colleagues to ensure employees live their brands and marketing gets the value from their consumer experiences.
As noted above, expert systems and 'in-sourcing', eg metrics and forecasting to finance, will relieve brand managers of having to slog through the data overload and complexity. They will allow focus on essentials, thereby allowing marketers to get out more, although that may be more hope than expectation.
Neuroscience is not a practical brand management tool today but it surely will be within the next 50 years. No major new marcoms campaign or promotion or repackaging will be accepted before the neuroscientists have had their say. Modern-day pre-testing will be a thing of the past. The neuroscientists will get it wrong but not as often as pre-testers do.
It was good to see that one of the respondents for this article studied neuro-psychology at university. While marketers will always, and should, come from a variety of disciplines, this one is likely to grow in importance.
A visible symbol of both these trends will be widespread use of dashboards with which to drive the business. These are already becoming commonplace in large US companies, and are such an obvious requirement as to be a near certainty.
Imagine driving a car without a settled arrangement of instrumentation. And the dashboard will itself enhance the integration of marketing metrics with corporate goals.
Notes
1. Nathan Ansell, Benjamin Crawley, Jennifer Gershon, Liesa Johnston, Richard Lawrence, Lindsay Nuttall and Suzi Williams.

Walkers: Using social media in new product development

Dan Calladine

Research from comScore recently revealed that 75% (211m) of adult internet users in Europe visited social networks in December 2008. Bearing in mind that three years ago social networks were almost unheard of in Europe, this is an amazing statistic.
Generally speaking, each market has its favourite local network (for example: Hyves in Netherlands; Studivz in Germany: Tuenti in Spain), but Facebook has started to make real inroads into markets outside the UK, particularly in Italy.
An Italian colleague recently explained to me that if you joined an Italian network you could just connect to other Italians. Facebook had far more long-term potential, because it is so international.
The scale of social networks has increased marketers' desire to find ways of using them to actively connect with their audiences. The audience is there - so the potential to harness this power must also be there.
A good recent example from the UK is the 'Do us a Flavour' campaign by Walkers crisps, part of PepsiCo. Walkers is the most popular brand of crisps in the UK, and last year embarked on a mission to develop a new flavour through "crowdsourcing". Wired magazine defines the term as "the act of taking a job performed by a designated agent (usually an employee) and outsourcing it to an undefined, generally large group of people in the form of an open call".
In this case, Walkers asked consumers to suggest new flavours, via its website, together with a description and a picture to represent the flavour.
Reportedly one million flavours were submitted, from which six flavours were chosen to go into production. All six will be on sale in the UK until early May 2009, when a winner will be chosen from public votes. As soon as the six flavours were chosen, the campaign moved to Facebook to add a social element.
A Facebook page was created for the overall campaign, where has 8000 'fans' have made nearly 500 wallposts. In addition, there are individual pages for each of the flavours, so that people can become fans of specific variants, such as Chilli & Chocolate and Builders Breakfast. Here, they can discuss their merits and cast a vote to decide the ultimate winner. (Incidentally, the smart money is on Builders Breakfast, which has far more fans than any of the others).
The Walkers' story well illustrates a recent quote from the American social media guru, Clay Shirky, who recently wrote: "More interesting than thinking about what's possible in 10 years is thinking what's possible now but that no one has built".
The work that Walkers is doing has been technically possible for some time, but it is only the increased popularity of social networks, like Facebook, that has provided the mass audience to make it worthwhile. With social media, we are now more limited by imagination than by technology.
Twitter is fast becoming the "new Facebook", in terms of the press coverage that it achieves. The buzz about the site in the media is very high at the moment, and has been climbing since late 2008, partly because of the use of the site by the then US Presidential candidate, Barack Obama.
Another reason for this surge of popularity is that, since Twitter does not sell advertising, many other sites do not see it as a competitor, and are happy to promote it and use it to connect with their audience.
For example, Google has now started "tweeting" officially, as has YouTube and MSN which, in the UK, has over 30 different accounts.
All of this serves to increase the popularity of Twitter, and seems to guarantee that it will keep growing in at least the short and medium term. The story for Twitter, and what it will add to social media, is only just beginning.
We are very, very unlikely to get 75% of internet users joining Twitter, but it is likely that things using elements of Twitter will soon start to make a real difference to people's lives.

Strategies from a new generation of challenger brands

Quarter 1, January 2009

Adam Morgan
eatbigfish

As we move into what looks to be the most severe downturn most of us have worked through, we will obviously need to consider what changes and what stays the same in how we approach brand building, marketing and sales.
The tendency will be to think in terms of a profound change in tactics. But I would argue that what is needed is a profound strategic shift in the way we think about marketing, and using what we have to build stronger relationships with consumers.

THINK ABOUT NEW STRATEGIES, NOT JUST NEW TACTICS
For years many marketers have been unintentionally lazy. They haven't explored the full potential of the marketing tools in front of them because they haven't needed to – they've always more or less worked. Over the next two to three years, the consumers are going to be short of money, time and attention. A recent study by OMD and Yahoo! suggests that the average global family man or woman was getting through 43 hours of activities in a 24-hour day, because they were doing a number of them at the same time – 36% of texting in the UK occurs in front of the TV.
So the challenge facing us is not just one of consumers being more value conscious, or having reduced budgets and resources. It is how we gain the attention, interest and renewed relationship with a consumer who has less time and inclination to listen to anything from people they do not have a strong and valued relationship with.
So what can we learn from people who have already been in this position?
Analysts typically tend to look at how brands generally have succeeded in previous recessions. I would suggest a different model – let's look at recent examples of brands that have built strong relationships with time-poor consumers in busy marketplaces with very limited budgets. In other words, people whose circumstances have always been those we are now suddenly finding ourselves in. Let's take a recent generation of challengers and see what we can learn from how they have succeeded in creating stronger relationships with challenged resources.

I would suggest that there are five thought-provoking themes for us to draw on.

1. Make Yourself Visible
At the risk of stating the obvious, if you are competing in a world where attention is at a premium, the first thing you need to be is visible. Yet most of the brands around us are, to all intents and purposes, invisible. Unremarkable in their product or service offer, they rely instead on communications to give them visibility, and difference.
But if we cannot rely on adspend to make us visible, we will have to find ways of creating more intrinsic visibility.
Look at method, for instance (Figure 1). Unable to rely on advertising they have built unique visibility into their structural packaging by investing in eye-catching iconic design.









In the service sector, npower has recently looked to compete against British Gas' boiler service by creating a hometeam who want to make visible the respect they give to their customers' homes when they service them. They make this respect instantly visible by literally rolling out a red carpet to protect the floor and furniture while they are working – a brilliant piece of theatre that has led to business increases of up to 50%.

2. Be Startlingly Useful
Google has risen from being one of a number of search engines to become not simply the global leader in search, but one of the world's favourite brands (in May, it was voted 'the UK's Best Loved Brand'). And yet it has done this without any active marketing of itself at all.
For those of us trained to believe that powerful marketing was the way one built brands with strong relationships with consumers, this is an extraordinary disruption. How on earth did it do that?




The answer is that it did it by being startlingly useful. I search for the 'meaning of life' and it gives me 20 million possible answers in 0.08 seconds. Or if I want to see what my neighbours' gardens look like, I punch in their details on Google Earth and there they all are. I have forgotten to send my party guests directions – Google Maps helps me do it in a couple of minutes. It is this startling usefulness that makes Google loved without doing any marketing – over and above, of course, having an exceptional product.
Not all of us can offer startling usefulness in everything we do. But we can look for places to create it. And those challengers that do are rewarded with word of mouth and affection disproportionate to their actual size. Virgin Mobile in Australia has offered its users a variety of startlingly useful services that show it understands the real lives of its customers – rescue services that help you get out of a bad date, for example, or that stop you calling up your ex when you are a little over-refreshed. Without any paid-for communication, it became the talk of every bar and party every weekend.
Of course I am being a little glib here because Google is not just offering startling usefulness, it is also free. But the challenge to us holds: how could we make all or some of our offer startlingly useful?

3. Find a Source of Conflict
So we have made ourselves genuinely visible, and are looking at how to make our product or service startlingly useful. What next? We need to be more compelling as brands.
There is much that we have forgotten from English classes, but the one thing we do remember is that what makes any story compelling is conflict. Not necessarily in the sense of person vs person, but in terms of the protagonist needing to overcome something in order to succeed. And if we look at challengers who break through with very limited resources, it is because they are often creating compelling stories for us by finding something else in popular culture to rub up against. They recognise that having a clear sense of themselves is only half of what they need in order to capture our imaginations – they need another surface of some kind to rub up against.
There are said to be seven kinds of conflict to create a drama that draws us in. The seven types of conflict are:

1. man vs man


2. man vs nature


3. man vs societal environment


4. man vs machines


5. man vs religion/God


6. man vs self


7. man vs supernatural.
   

The conflict that deserves a little more attention is the last of these (man vs supernatural), and particularly the idea of how challengers create and use monsters to make themselves more compelling to us.
Monsters have a number of important values in stories. They raise the stakes by creating drama, emotion and conflict. They throw up a hero. They give the hero a very visible adversary and clearly position the hero as being on the side of right. They highlight what his or her virtues are – there is nothing like a little darkness to give definition to light.
Perhaps most important from our point of view, monsters unite the community against them. This is one of the important differences between a monster and an enemy: an enemy is a threat to you, but a monster is a threat to the larger community. This is what brings the community together: however disparate, divided or simply indolent the community had been up to that point, the presence of a monster brings them together in unity against it. And in fighting the monster, the hero (or challenger) is thus fighting not just for themselves, but as the champion of the community as a whole.
We have seen challengers use monsters in this way for years. In many ways Richard Branson's brilliance has been to convince us that his personal business enemies (such as BA) are in fact monsters working against the interests of us all, and that he is our champion, fighting them on our behalf.
Fast forward 20 years. What makes this strategy much more interesting and powerful for a challenger today, is the ability we now have to mobilise these communities against our chosen monsters. This kind of mobilisation can take place in both grass-roots marketing and within social media and networks. The monsters we see such challengers rallying their chosen community against are not always other brands – they are often historical characteristics of the category that they are making redundant (the postal film service Netflix railing against late fees for DVD return) or social tendencies such as conformity (Vivienne Westwood's bête noire).
The household cleaning range, method, whose packaging we noticed earlier, has created a monster in the US called Toxicity. Method goes to a city, sets up in a pop-up store and invites people to 'Detox their lives' – to come and exchange all their toxic products for method's environmentally friendly ones. All of this, of course, is publicised and the community engaged and mobilised through blog and press. Through the careful creation of a monster, method has created a compelling and involving story which people tell each other for them.
We tend to think of the classic challenger as 'little guy vs big guy'; in fact, it is far more often 'hero vs monster'.

4. Rethink your Media
We all know the innocent story, yet we continue to misinterpret its real relevance. To judge from the tsunami of imitations across all categories, you would be forgiven for thinking that the key learning from innocent is to be a little more chatty on the side of our packs.
But innocent's thinking as a challenger was much more profound than that: it was to recognise that packaging of all kinds, delivery vehicles of all kinds, and POS presentation of all kinds are all media. These media are, in many ways, the most effective media you can ever 'buy' because every single piece of it is reaching your desired target audience. If you characterise them as house media, they need as much creativity, refreshment and senior attention as any other kind of media we have more traditionally put on a conventional plan.
So as paid-for communications budgets are pared down, look at putting our house media on the media plan, and behave towards them with the creativity and senior attention they deserve. Packaging, leaflets, service plans, stacking trays – think of these as the canvas for brand expression.
Next is social media – not to be automatically confused with digital media. There may be all kinds of social media that would create more goodwill and attention than a viral communication.
For example, Umpqua Bank, a regional challenger bank in the North-west of the US, has for a number of years operated what it calls 'handshake marketing' – acts of neighbourliness in its physical community that create goodwill and conversation. So for instance, at one point they rented and branded vans that simply drove around distributing free ice cream in summer and free hot chocolate in winter. This simple act of social goodwill inexpensively positioned it as the bank that really is a friend of the community, and created considerable social conversation and coverage in the process.

5. Take Personal Responsibility for Talkability
Which brings us to talkability. We know that challengers thrive on PR. But up to now we have left it to our PR agency to come up with an episodic series of initiatives planned out in advance throughout the year to generate on- and offline buzz. What a more recent generation of challengers is teaching us is that the people in charge of the marketing take personal responsibility for making sure the brand is always being talked about.
42BELOW, the New Zealand super-premium vodka, has never had a formal advertising budget and so constantly sought to keep itself in the news through PR. When the founder felt the brand had been out of the news for a few weeks, he would convene his team, they would look at the day's papers and see what topical stories they could attach themselves to that week.
In one meeting the team read that that morning the New Zealand Navy had announced it was selling off one of its frigates. By early afternoon that same day the team had sent the paper an illustrated story that they were pitching to buy the frigate to turn it into a 42BELOW nightclub. The paper published the picture the next day alongside the story, and the radio stations soon followed. 42BELOW was back in the news again.
Reframing your objectives for your story will help you push it as far as it needs to go to really break through. Skandia had sponsored British sailing for years but coverage had never got beyond the sports pages. Looking for more mainstream coverage before the Olympics, it asked itself what it would take to get in the main body of the papers. The answer it came up with was to get the future Olympians naked, and then paint them gold. The story and picture got a double-page spread in a leading Sunday newspaper and was then picked up by a number of dailies in the week that followed.

IN CONCLUSION
This is not a time for tweaking, or simply falling into temporary tactical offsetting. It is a time to embrace what it will take to succeed as a brand in an environment where it will be much harder to genuinely engage a consumer's imagination and pocket.

Topps 3D Live

Admittedly it often doesn't take a whole lot to blow our tiny little minds, but this latest piece of augmented reality wizardry from Total Immersion is quite special...In collaboration with Topps, makers of confectionery and trading cards, Total Immersion has created a new series of 3D Live baseball cards which put superstar players in the palm of your hand. Like any other augmented reality (AR) initiative, users need simply to hold the card in front of a conventional webcam, at which point a fully 3D rendering of the featured player appears. However, using a simple online interface, users can then drop the player straight into a selection of simple practice games. We suggest (no, insist) that you check out the video below (courtesy of CrunchGear.com) to see exactly how this looks.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QAjEGqGnpFI

The only thing which caused more excitement in the Contagious office was the realisation that Topps is also responsible for the Match Attax football card dynasty. We were left wondering how long it would be until we’re in possession of pocket-sized, animated Crystal Palace (edit ) Liverpool (edit ) Middlesbrough players...For more extraordinary augmented reality from Total Immersion, check out the link below for a demo.

http://tiny.cc/KkRWx

http://www.t-immersion.com/

Richo: Times Square Adopts 'Windvertising'

March 10, 2009
-By Katy Bachman,

MediweekIn the next few weeks, Japanese copy and photo manufacturer Ricoh will launch a Times Square spectacular powered by wind at 42nd and 7th Ave. The sign, using wind turbine technology developed by WePOWER, will be powered by 16 wind turbines and 64 solar panels, saving 18 tons of carbon per year and about $12,000 to $15,000 a month in electricity.Ricoh isn't the only advertiser to seek an eco-solution in outdoor's most iconic locale. On New Year's Eve, Coca-Cola Co. launched its new digital billboard at 47th and Broadway powered by wind, offsetting the release of 1,866 metric tons of carbon dioxide a year.WePOWER, which calls its eco-outdoor ad solution, "windvertising," expects to work directly with advertisers on about 25 custom applications of its technology this year, expanding its footprint in 2010. The company is also in discussions with outdoor media companies about applying its technology in other locations. In addition to the sign itself, windvertising could also be applied to the turbine's air foil blades to reflect an image, creating a moving image. "I always tell people to think of Windvertising as a flipbook that you played with as a child," said Marvin Winkler, CEO of WePOWER.According to Winkler, if the nation's 500,000 billboards were to adopt Windvertising, the billboards, spinning at 10 mph would generate 16.8 billion kWh of electricity. They could power approximately 1.5 million homes and would reduce about 5.3 million tons of CO2 being emitted into the air.

Quaker Oats Jumps on Health and Wellness Bandwagon

March 9, 2009
-By Elaine Wong

PepsiCo's Quaker Oats today fueled New Yorkers' morning commute as part of a breakfast giveaway, which is tied to a new campaign touting the company's whole grain oats.The event, which took place in New York’s Times Square, marks the first time the company will kick off an integrated campaign linking all of its oat products—including Life cereal and Chewy granola bars—under the health and wellness category.

The campaign is dubbed “Go Humans Go.”Former Oprah Winfrey chef Art Smith was on site in Times Square for the breakfast giveaway, which included hot oatmeal and energy smoothies. The promotion coincided with Quaker Oats' renewed emphasis on cause marketing, as the brand steps up its hunger awareness project with charitable partner Share Our Strength.

Today's event also featured an on-site food donation drive, hunger awareness bloggers and bicyclists using “pedal power” to blend their own smoothies.Outdoor elements of the campaign have started appearing on Quaker Oats’ Web site, and on bus and taxicab ads in the Big Apple and other major metropolitan cities. The bulk of the effort begins March 16, with television ads elaborating on the “oat as a nutritious fuel” theme. The ads were created by Quaker Oats’ new lead agency, Goodby, Silverstein & Partners.

Print ads will appear in April in consumer publications.In an interview with Brandweek, Quaker Oats CMO Annie Young-Scrivner said the company chose to focus on the oat because “it’s not just a grain. It’s a super grain that powers your day and helps you do amazing things.

It lifts you physically and emotionally and makes you feel good knowing you did something good for someone and yourself, and it’s one of the most nutritious grains.”Quaker Oats, which spent $50 million on advertising last year (not including online initiatives), per Nielsen Monitor-Plus, may be onto something, said Harry Balzer, vp at the NPD Group’s Chicago office.

Calling attention to oats' wholesome, filling properties is indicative of a larger consumer trend: The shift from meat-based to grain-based meals, Balzer said. “It’s a way of moderating food costs,” he added, noting that grain-based meals are usually cheaper.